From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44411: 28.0.50; uudecode-decode-region-internal is broken Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 17:36:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83d00ucv0j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y2ji6e0y.wl--xmue@d1.dion.ne.jp> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22737"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44411@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kazuhiro Ito Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 03 17:07:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyq0-0005p1-IO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 17:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33472 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZypz-0001rU-K4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:07:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyMo-0006ry-5O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyMn-0002fV-Pv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyMn-0001g3-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 15:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44411 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 44411-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44411.16044178056422 (code B ref 44411); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 15:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44411) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2020 15:36:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyMX-0001fV-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyMV-0001fH-Jz for 44411@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyMO-0002W2-L6; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:36:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2564 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kZyMN-0006bg-Ni; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:36:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86y2ji6e0y.wl--xmue@d1.dion.ne.jp> (message from Kazuhiro Ito on Tue, 03 Nov 2020 17:27:41 +0900) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:192620 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 17:27:41 +0900 > From: Kazuhiro Ito > > When I call uudecode-decode-region-internal in multibyte buffer, it > fails to decode eight-bit characters. What do you mean by "decode eight-bit characters"? There's no such thing in the "real world", it is entirely an Emacs invention. How could such "characters" appear in uuencoded email message? Can you describe the real-life use case where this happened? > Additionally, concat and char-to-string functions are called so > frequently that deocder is very slow for large data. Please show only the changes to fix what you think is a bug. let's leave the optimization alone for a moment, so that it doesn't muddy the waters. Thanks.