From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46670: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] possible miscompilation affecting lsp-mode Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:31:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83czworwnx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6ry46uc.fsf@collares.org> <83tuq0ry7i.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37512"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46670@debbugs.gnu.org, mauricio@collares.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 16:34:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIfA-0009dT-Af for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:34:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35168 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIf9-0002lZ-Dr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIdS-0001fv-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIdS-0007SN-8e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIdS-00056O-5m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46670 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46670-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46670.161426712919547 (code B ref 46670); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46670) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 15:32:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39022 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIca-00055D-Lo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIcY-00054J-CN for 46670@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIcS-00072L-Mn; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:32:00 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4360 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lFIcS-0006V0-1N; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:32:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:14:52 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200788 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:14:52 +0000 > Cc: Andrea Corallo , 46670@debbugs.gnu.org, mauricio@collares.org > > > Andrea's work is > > still mainly devoted to fixing issues reported against the native-comp > > code. Polishing the documentation will come later. So please don't > > expect the documentation to be anywhere near perfect, as we all are > > used to expect from mainline Emacs code, and please don't blame Andrea > > for not providing such quality of documentation at this point in time. > > Again, you're absolutely correct. In the specific cases I mentioned, > my main concern is that other hackers will find it too frustrating to > encounter subtle restrictions that sometimes, incorrectly, feel like > pitfalls and look like bugs. Any improvements to the documentation on the branch are of course very welcome, regardless of the fact that it's still WIP.