From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46773: 28.0.50; Different heights for toolbar Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:03:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83czwnqbnp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lfbc4139.fsf@gnus.org> <83blc8rwej.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0qwt88d.fsf@gmail.com> <8335xkropd.fsf@gnu.org> <878s7b19a6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11673"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46773@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Robert Pluim , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 13:04:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbqy-0002tz-0Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:04:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37256 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbqw-0000JL-W2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:04:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbqk-0000Is-EK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbqk-0007Ng-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbqk-0000mx-1s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46773 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46773-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46773.16143410072990 (code B ref 46773); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46773) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 12:03:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbqB-0000mA-K7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:03:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbqA-0000ly-FT for 46773@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:03:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbq4-00075P-Md; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:03:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4443 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbq3-0006Iu-Uo; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:03:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878s7b19a6.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:13:37 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200850 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: 46773@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:13:37 +0100 > > >> Didnʼt we vaguely agree that we should remove the text from the GTK > >> toolbar, as itʼs the only one that does it? > > Eli> If we did, I don't remember such an agreement. Which doesn't mean it > Eli> didn't happen, of course. > > It was a vague memory of a vague agreement, which I now canʼt find in > my archives. Perhaps we should do it anyway. I "vaguely" remember that Dmitry likes that, so let's hear his opinion first.