From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42790: [PATH] 27.1; Add version info into file name "emacs.pdmp" to avoid mismatch pdmp file Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:22:37 +0200 Message-ID: <83czwmotz6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ft8unbwe.fsf@igel.home> <83o8jsysm8.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9339"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, 42790@debbugs.gnu.org, lin.sun@zoom.us To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 08:23:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwg-0002K1-NR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:23:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59432 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwf-0002rg-AC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwM-0002rB-QL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwM-0006D5-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwM-00060K-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42790 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed patch Original-Received: via spool by 42790-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42790.161441057823056 (code B ref 42790); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42790) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 07:22:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43102 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwI-0005zo-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:22:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwH-0005zd-2x for 42790@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:22:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwA-00066d-1Y; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:22:50 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4103 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtw5-0004xe-Ux; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:22:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Glenn Morris on Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:40:22 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200920 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Daniel Colascione , 42790@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, lin.sun@zoom.us > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:40:22 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I hope this gets cleaned up, because I think it would be good to have > > this fixed for Emacs 27.2. > > No response; presumably it's now too late. Yes, pretty much. > (FWIW I think it would be straightforward for someone whose C isn't > execrable like mine.) > > I really think having some central list of "issues that should be fixed > before the next release" would help with this kind of thing. > > The debbugs blocking mechanism has been used for this previously. > If you don't like it that's fine, please use whatever you prefer. > Eg monthly summary postings to emacs-devel, anything. It's okay to use debbugs blocking, but the problem is, we have no real mechanism to make sure the blocking problems will be worked on, and the fact that some aren't is an indirect evidence that those problems aren't acute. So delaying a release indefinitely due to such problems doesn't sound wise to me: we are already accused of having too long release cycles.