From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:10:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83czwcwhpz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qoj9zv.fsf@gnu.org> <83im68j963.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuprhur0.fsf@gnu.org> <831rcu25o2.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9a6zr22.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8fyzjrz.fsf@gnu.org> <86sg593vfm.fsf@gmail.com> <86mtvgwk9s.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23233"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 06 14:11:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWiA-0005wa-N2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 14:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59354 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWi9-0005y4-6p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:11:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWhy-0005xv-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWhy-00089c-5k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWhy-0002hX-0p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 13:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.161503625510370 (code B ref 46256); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 13:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 13:10:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWhr-0002hC-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:10:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWhq-0002h0-3t for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWhk-00081s-Mg; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:10:48 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3183 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lIWhk-0005z1-1Y; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:10:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86mtvgwk9s.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Andy Moreton on Sat, 06 Mar 2021 12:15:27 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201627 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 12:15:27 +0000 > > > IIUC, we don't actually call dlclose() until we GC (and might not do > > so even then, since GC is conservative). > > In that case keeping the handles open is the real bug here, and it would > be better to focus on how to ensure that resources are released corectly. > > Is there a similar issue in the dynamic modules interface ? Which problem is that? At least on MS-Windows, a DLL remains open for as long as the program that loaded it keeps running. How is the situation discussed here different?