From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45834: 28.0.50; Mouse events in terminal emacs Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 09:30:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83czpil0qs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4653d6b7-8824-4113-ac5a-2793b9d84c8c@www.fastmail.com> <87k0s9mnxs.fsf@gnus.org> <87v9bthryl.fsf@gnus.org> <831reh7x8x.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtx5hr2d.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmtj1kdv.fsf@gnus.org> <83y287mm4a.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfyfz93a.fsf@gnus.org> <83v93bmd0k.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnnrxkrw.fsf@gnus.org> <83o893mc1g.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtonmbs5.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsufxjzq.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilzbmay6.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6knm4t7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8076"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 45834@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 09 08:31:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mODak-0001w2-Uk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:31:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54262 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODaj-00044t-PT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODaR-000431-De for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODaQ-0001SV-JU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mODaQ-0001Af-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 06:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45834.16311690164445 (code B ref 45834); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 06:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2021 06:30:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mODZg-00019d-Bk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mODZc-00019L-Uc for 45834@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODZW-0000hf-Jn; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4896 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mODZW-0002Tx-2K; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:30:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:22:48 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213876 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 45834@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:22:48 -0400 > > Eli wrote: > > I meant the original input: "ESC [ I" This should be a complete key > > sequence, given the following: > > > > (define-key map "\e[I" #'xterm-translate-focus-in) > > `xterm-translate-focus-in` works at the level of keysequence remapping, > so "ESC [ I" is indeed a complete sequence but *for a remapping* and > it's remapped to the empty keysequence, which is not a complete keysequence. > > In the sense of `C-h k`, "\e[I" is not bound to `xterm-translate-focus-in`. > > AFAIK we don't currently have a command to query which key-remapping > happened for a given sequence of events, IOW, there is no equivalent to > `C-h k` that could tell the user that "\e[I" is "bound" to > `xterm-translate-focus-in`. > > The closest that we have is that `C-h k` will tell the users both the > remapped keysequence and the original ("untranslated") keysequence. So you are basically saying that this stuff works as intended, and the key-echo should be considered a "feature", or at worst a harmless misfeature?