From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 17:22:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83czkqwfoc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czn8etuz.7.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tugkkfid.fsf@gnus.org> <83fss44rbn.fsf@gnu.org> <875yt0ipre.fsf@gnus.org> <834k8k3za3.fsf@gnu.org> <874k8jfloo.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgqb18hq.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqb6tcm.fsf@gnus.org> <87tue3y96e.fsf@gnus.org> <83fspny8fp.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmory859.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee57y7xz.fsf@gnu.org> <87lezfy70y.fsf@gnus.org> <83czkry6jw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7a3y5no.fsf@gnus.org> <87czkry3h8.fsf@gnus.org> <835yqjy26h.fsf@gnu.org> <878rveybyf.fsf@gnus.org> <49EACC4C-E21E-4123-A3D2-901958CF7DC4@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23053"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org To: larsi@gnus.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 16:51:27 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9UI3-0005jj-1K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:51:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51864 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9UI1-0002jf-H3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:51:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Tqg-0000Z8-0C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:23:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9TqY-0006KJ-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9TqY-0000gf-Fk; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 51733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51733.16424329502584 (code B ref 51733); Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2022 15:22:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47624 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Tq2-0000fc-Dc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:22:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Tpz-0000fM-1d for 51733@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:22:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=40262 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Tpt-0006Ex-LG; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:22:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=QU1qwbau5MaCKwQIANfxXOXm5MSRiE3P61QTiHcnA7A=; b=II/mSeTyDS8b VuTcFczmzFn74PzTXR2utOmDY1yYwhPUkpmc5ueoFyhCA89giYjuhprtdu/M0AGFvEbQXltcLCaHW CE+XH7RE6Wa0Mq9D/QRwBhIRgQn1nP1BRMUzuG4DbZ5tV9Dh6Q1hrdsjoEhsGaSJ4LTd61O3VVint 35kzQohJCv55RHBveoZdBokp2CFOt4wn00+LqZf9T384uDpe7Z7vI1MyBfOtIvtN0R4TUaERg7auJ GcmXSmSxITAEPPdVCcjk15UNniP5qzFzGcVrq/fyv+W7u59b/y134KiuI505PyGy6q5W276nO4F1q o/MTWOClJknf+ZXvTt8zgA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4024 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9Tpt-0002ck-P0; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:22:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49EACC4C-E21E-4123-A3D2-901958CF7DC4@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:18:44 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224447 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:18:44 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > > It is confusing to have 2 separate properties of a character that are subtly incompatible, and for such obscure properties at that. It will be source of many problems. So I think we should avoid that if it's feasible. Can we plrase discuss any real problems that would be xaused by using the existing char-table? I've now wrote a Lisp program to produce script property according to Unicode vs what we have in char-script-table, so it's possible to see all the differences.