From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66245: [PATCH] ; Silence macOS 14 warning Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:55:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83cyy1yqoc.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19074"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 66245@debbugs.gnu.org, me@eshelyaron.com To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 29 16:57:31 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEvr-0004fe-KQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:57:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEvJ-0008LO-Da; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:56:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEvD-00083J-BM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEvD-000640-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEvN-0000oY-Rw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66245 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 66245-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66245.16959993983092 (code B ref 66245); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66245) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2023 14:56:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56906 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEuz-0000nn-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:56:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56930) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEuv-0000nT-1Q for 66245@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmEuY-0005x1-Mm; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:56:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=8zp7VsEbGLuweU3YIGx2dTeQWMiDtQlxYwVSnYPZE5o=; b=Ix0lU07KlI3F kGpjTSfFlFApK6uAklCw1Oo95ulAbweiTaIw+ssoRkqQicB/Eb/gD0ASEPIzjrvA++9lCKz87oda1 DeysrtnpgO3+oZ63ylB9CihszZcl86tNA1Wn4ElcWet/I97cUGfiUzCoL1WHQ5kSNux5Nf79M+mgj Kj+voPAHhBVWs9cFYCgNve18ND1LJJsVpbioUCGRDi8E9XKatE+Ft13GrUtUEfpIEp7szAXCWifsN hqfhGm4wQDDD97nEtV3LN7g+2rdNHyRMbUG9/TmUJK0W+hbAGQFrV3DsHk7fjwK2UNO6ObHMxIrUn m4kCm4jJ3P1uAU7WSl7Ftw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Alan Third on Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:47:34 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:271496 Archived-At: > Cc: 66245@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:47:34 +0100 > From: Alan Third > > Eli, Stefan, any thoughts? Does this look bad enough to force a new > Emacs 29 release? I don't understand this issue clearly enough to have an opinion, so I trust you guys to decide whether this is important. In any case, if we are worth our salt, Emacs 29.2 should be just a month or two away, so I wouldn't make any emergency releases before that, just for this issue. After all, it isn't like Emacs doesn't work, it just annoys you with a message at startup, right?