From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8664: Being more-systematic about user-interface timestamps Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:41:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83boz5fwlb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4DCC3BD6.3000200@cs.ucla.edu> <4DCC425E.2070608@cs.ucla.edu> <831v03gewe.fsf@gnu.org> <4DCE4703.30703@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305366132 26713 80.91.229.12 (14 May 2011 09:42:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 09:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8664@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 14 11:42:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBMN-0003fi-NY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 11:42:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39844 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBMN-0000tA-0S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBMK-0000st-76 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBMJ-0003CG-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBMI-0003Ba-Tq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBMI-0006pL-Dk; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 09:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8664 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8664-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8664.130536610226216 (code B ref 8664); Sat, 14 May 2011 09:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2011 09:41:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBLy-0006on-NF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QLBLv-0006oY-Nj for 8664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:41:41 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LL600600IQOBB00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 8664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 12:41:26 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.10.122]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LL6005VCIX1TF80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 May 2011 12:41:26 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4DCE4703.30703@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 05:42:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46462 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 02:10:27 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: 8664@debbugs.gnu.org > > No change should be needed for w32's hooks, since there's no actual change > to the data type there. It will break if the typedef is ever changed to be incompatible. > For documentation purposes it might be nice to run through the hooks > and change 'unsigned long' to 'Time' where appropriate, but that's > not essential. Normally I'm reluctant to mess with the w32 code as > I can't easily test it. Changing a single declaration to an obviously correct one, and an equivalent one at that, can hardly be qualified as "messing". Besides, people will understand if you botch their build trying to keep it from breaking, but may not understand why you knowingly refrain from making a change that clearly is TRT.