From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:26:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83bowme6hz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311344895 1674 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2011 14:28:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org To: sds@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 22 16:28:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhz-0002ku-OC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:28:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhy-000729-MV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhv-00071z-Gy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhu-0005v5-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhu-0005v1-EQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGht-00029B-RG; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9132 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9132-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9132.13113448478213 (code B ref 9132); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 14:27:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhK-00028Q-Iv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:27:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGhH-00028C-Dz for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOQ00I00NZLYQ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:26:28 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOQ00IG6O43X720@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:26:28 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:28:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49558 Archived-At: > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:08 -0400 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-22 09:00:30 +0300]: > > > > So the symbol is bound, but Emacs thinks it's not a function? What > > does this print? > > > > "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el > > --eval "(print (symbol-function 'batch-byte-compile))" > > (closure (byte-compile--for-effect print-gensym-alist byte-compile--outbuffer by > te-compiler-error-flag byte-compile-free-assignments byte-compile-free-reference > s t) (&optional noforce) "Run `byte-compile-file' on the files remaining on the > command line. > Use this from the command line, with `-batch'; > it won't work in an interactive Emacs. > Each file is processed even if an error occurred previously. > For example, invoke \"emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile $emacs/ ~/*.el\". > If NOFORCE is non-nil, don't recompile a file that seems to be > already up-to-date." (defvar command-line-args-left) (if (not noninteractive) (e > rror "`batch-byte-compile' is to be used only with -batch")) (let ((error nil)) > (while command-line-args-left (if (file-directory-p (expand-file-name (car comma > nd-line-args-left))) (let (source dest) (dolist (file (directory-files (car comm > and-line-args-left))) (if (and (string-match emacs-lisp-file-regexp file) (not ( > auto-save-file-name-p file)) (setq source (expand-file-name file (car command-li > ne-args-left))) (setq dest (byte-compile-dest-file source)) (file-exists-p dest) > (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file source > )) (setq error t))))) (if (or (not noforce) (let* ((source (car command-line-arg > s-left)) (dest (byte-compile-dest-file source))) (or (not (file-exists-p dest)) > (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)))) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file (car > command-line-args-left))) (setq error t)))) (setq command-line-args-left (cdr co > mmand-line-args-left))) (kill-emacs (if error 1 0)))) Now I'm totally stumped: it shows contents of the symbol-function cell, but still claims that the function is undefined?? > >> why do I have oo and oo-spd?! > > > > oo/ is the unoptimized build, oo-spd/ the optimized one. Neat, ain't > > it? > > I would prefer to be able to specify this from the configure command line. Patches for that are welcome (although I personally would not have any use for such an option).