From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13065: Bug in x-file-dialog with GetOpenFileName Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:35:41 +0200 Message-ID: <83boctrqg2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83liddr5u8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pq1fhlbo.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4lvgydf.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw251bzq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358094965 8443 80.91.229.3 (13 Jan 2013 16:36:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13065@debbugs.gnu.org, duyanning@gmail.com To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 13 17:36:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQXh-0003Tt-9e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:36:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQXR-00040V-3l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:36:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQXI-0003vF-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:35:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQXA-000669-0G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:35:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQX9-000664-Pi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:35:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQXS-0004LG-BO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13065 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13065-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13065.135809494216660 (code B ref 13065); Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13065) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2013 16:35:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58375 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQX7-0004Ke-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:35:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:64687) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TuQX5-0004KQ-LL for 13065@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:35:40 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MGK00I00O30KQ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 13065@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:35:14 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MGK00IGJOQPJX50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:35:14 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87fw251bzq.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69717 Archived-At: > From: Jason Rumney > Cc: duyanning@gmail.com, 13065@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:52:25 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Is it not just a case of doing the same as we did previously? > >> > >> /* If we compile with _WIN32_WINNT set to 0x0400 (for NT4 > >> compatibility) we end up with the old file dialogs. Define a big > >> enough struct for the new dialog to trick GetOpenFileName into > >> giving us the new dialogs on newer versions of Windows. */ > > > > Sorry, I don't understand: we still do what the above comment > > describes. > > I meant maybe we need to increase the size of the struct again to fool > Windows 7 into thinking we are compiling against a more recent version > of the SDK. Thanks, will try that some time soon.