From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15816: 24.3; (format-time-string "%h") returns "" instead of month Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:16:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83bo1x7s3p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84mwlics2u.fsf@gmail.com> <87eh6ujadh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383733032 24619 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2013 10:17:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andrea.rossetti@gmail.com, 15816@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 06 11:17:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0Al-0001XX-RB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:17:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0Al-0007I7-Av for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:17:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0Ad-0007Gv-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:17:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0AY-0002de-Kc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:17:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0AY-0002da-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0AX-0000EL-Ky for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15816 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15816-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15816.1383732999851 (code B ref 15816); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15816) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2013 10:16:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0A7-0000DZ-LO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:16:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:50626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve0A3-0000DH-IC for 15816@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:16:32 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVU00K0071Y9R00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 15816@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:16:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVU00JJ877DXA60@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:16:25 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87eh6ujadh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80070 Archived-At: > From: Bastien > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:46:18 +0100 > Cc: andrea.rossetti@gmail.com, 15816@debbugs.gnu.org > > By the way, the docstring of `format-time-string' suggests that > %b and %h are equivalent: is there a difference? Not AFAIK.