From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16647: Imprecisions with window-resizing cursors Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:29:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnxrwbs8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y51qnlfe.fsf@gmail.com> <52F21707.9050509@gmx.at> <87k3d81tqz.fsf@gmail.com> <52F3635C.9040408@gmx.at> <877g96g76g.fsf@gmail.com> <52F530A7.1090104@gmx.at> <871tz7pcop.fsf@gmail.com> <52FE0059.4080508@gmx.at> <8738jlk6zn.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <52FE5FA0.6020202@gmx.at> <87lhxdgvcc.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <530093B0.50501@gmx.at> <87ob26x6pl.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <871tyyh0am.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <5307A0B4.3070003@gmx.at> <87fvnchwgz.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <53086B2A.4020804@gmx.at> <87txbrrphk.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87eh2vgfph.fsf@gmail.com> <5308F1DC.6010108@gmx.at> <87mwhj9da6.fsf@gmail.com> <5309D323.5010607@gmx.at> <87lhx19zn9.fsf@gmail.com> <530AF735.7070106@gmx.at> <877g8kmzr5.fsf@gmail.com> <530B8B8D.1030102@gmx.at> <8738j8m7p2.fsf@gmail.com> <530DBF22.3050100@gmx.at> <8338j5zuum.fsf@gnu.org> <530F9956.7050301@gmx.at> <83bnxsxpda.fsf@gnu.org> <53106C3C.8080009@gmx.at> <83iorzwjz3.fsf@gnu.org> <53108558.5090107@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393597814 14310 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2014 14:30:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, esabof@gmail.com, 16647@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 28 15:30:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOSC-0000Z3-NA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:30:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOSC-0004zq-BL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOS4-0004x5-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:30:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJORy-0003a6-UZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42627) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJORy-0003Zm-RS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:30:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJORw-00015y-S7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:30:05 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16647 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16647-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16647.13935977874159 (code B ref 16647); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2014 14:29:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43809 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJORe-000150-1g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:29:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:52413) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJORa-00014o-6n for 16647@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:29:43 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1P00B00MGBHZ00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 16647@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:28:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1P004ULMUTFU80@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:28:06 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <53108558.5090107@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86393 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:47:20 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: esabof@gmail.com, nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 16647@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Why do you need an exactly the same signature? Can't a macro or a > > wrapper function take care of the differences? The code will have to > > be separately compiled on each platform anyway. > > Sure. But for me writing a macro or a wrapper is tantamount to writing > that function from scratch. Having it in the RIF would be optimal. RIF doesn't go to such low levels (and shouldn't, if you ask me).