From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16733: messed up unicode chars in package description Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:02:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnwy46p5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7tfvnn7phj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zjkm865z.fsf@gnu.org> <838us496xy.fsf@gnu.org> <8338ia66fd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395500593 18197 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2014 15:03:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16733@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 22 16:03:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNS9-0003cm-Nl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:03:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57255 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNS9-0004Hb-6o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNS0-0004HH-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNRu-00029I-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNRu-00029A-JS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNRt-0007wL-RZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16733.139550057130500 (code B ref 16733); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2014 15:02:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNRj-0007vr-Er for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:02:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:45511) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNRh-0007vi-00 for 16733@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2U00700E1RE000@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 16733@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:02:39 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2U00BB6F4FKS00@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:02:39 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87166 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:39:28 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 16733@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Stefan wrote: > > > And IIUC we already have a(nother) fix > > for the glaring bug installed in emacs-24. > > Yes. The current fix disregards HTTP headers and uses the highest > priority coding system that can decode the received text. It is not > impossible to imagine cases where that would fail The correct fix is not much more complex, so I wonder why do we need to settle for less than that, when the pretest not even started yet. There's no danger to destabilize anything here. > but given that most ELPA entries are likely to be ASCII or UTF-8, > I'm not really worried. Indeed, but that goes both ways: the correct fix will not be able to make too much damage, even if it misses something.