From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18745: 24.3; MS Windows, `call-process-shell-command' fails on `shell-quote-argument'ed bat file with quoted args Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:05:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83bnpb2pv7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ppds4ig5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413525986 15324 80.91.229.3 (17 Oct 2014 06:06:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18745@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 17 08:06:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0g6-0000H8-4o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:06:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57826 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0g5-0007zb-JW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:06:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0fw-0007zO-RH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0fq-0000ly-TB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0fq-0000lu-PV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0fq-0002B0-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18745 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18745-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18745.14135259028285 (code B ref 18745); Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18745) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2014 06:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0er-00029M-Q0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:33458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf0eo-000291-4F for 18745@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 02:04:59 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NDK00D00R7O0W00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 18745@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:04:56 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NDK00C42RK7PGB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:04:56 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94661 > Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:50:32 -0400 > From: Noam Postavsky > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 18745@debbugs.gnu.org > > > - Why not use call-process instead (since you don't actually use the > > "shell-command" part, really)? > > That would probably make more sense, but it turns out not to help anyway: Since call-process-shell-command simply calls call-process, that's expected.