From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19468: 25.0.50; UI inconveniences with M-. Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:41:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnmlavd2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zja6b3tc.fsf@gnu.org> <54A24079.4020902@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419961340 12850 80.91.229.3 (30 Dec 2014 17:42:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, eller.helmut@gmail.com, 19468@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 30 18:42:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60o8-0006KT-7E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:42:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37727 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60o7-0000Si-Ih for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:42:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60o3-0000SS-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:42:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60ny-0001jt-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51906) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60ny-0001jp-HO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60ny-00048H-9K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19468 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19468-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19468.141996128715833 (code B ref 19468); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19468) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2014 17:41:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60nO-00047J-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:41:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:58709) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60nM-00047A-Nh for 19468@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:41:25 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NHE00L00OL95A00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 19468@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:39:14 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NHE00IZHP1EBQ30@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:39:14 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97851 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 19468@debbugs.gnu.org, Helmut Eller > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:03:30 -0500 > > > It's a tradeoff. Otherwise, you'd see two new buffers at once, possibly > > covering both windows (if you have two). And it seems inconsistent with your > > further complaint that movement visits files automatically (if it shouldn't, > > it shouldn't start with displaying the buffer at point either). > > I thought the problem that Eli was pointing out is that he requested > "display_line" and there is only one "display_line", so instead of > showing 3 entries (each one including "display_line" as a substring) we > should directly jump to the perfect match. Indeed, that's what I meant. It is okay to display other, less perfect, matches as well, but the exact match should be displayed without asking me to type anything else.