From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22120: Another backtrace Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:02:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83bn9y9lfd.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449774205 21671 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2015 19:03:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22120@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Hanchrow Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 20:03:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Ui-00083J-Px for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:03:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43998 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Ui-00022j-8Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Ub-00020p-JH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76UY-0008Pz-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76UY-0008Pt-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76UX-0005xO-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:03:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22120 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22120-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22120.144977415422861 (code B ref 22120); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22120) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2015 19:02:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76U5-0005wf-Rq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:02:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:38601) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76U4-0005wR-3j for 22120@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:02:32 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ500I00OQP1A00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 22120@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:02:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ500H5ZOW1PUA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:02:26 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109847 Archived-At: > From: Eric Hanchrow > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:42:19 +0000 > > What little I could get of the variables' values is at the bottom. It doesn't tell much. Can you try reproducing this in an unoptimized build? It's very hard to debug optimized code when we suspect some more or less random corruption of values. If the problem happens in an unoptimized build, we won't need to look so hard for bad values. Also, it looks like you configured with --enable-check-lisp-object-type, is that right? If so, please configure without it, that would allow to see many values directly in the backtrace, instead of asking you to print them in GDB. Thanks.