From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22241: 25.0.50; etags Ruby parser problems Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 18:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83bn7xyd43.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86r3i9hnbt.fsf@yandex.ru> <83si1o45g1.fsf@gnu.org> <56A3C53D.1050408@yandex.ru> <83oacc3yx7.fsf@gnu.org> <56A3D47E.3030802@yandex.ru> <83mvrw3tuj.fsf@gnu.org> <56A3F3F9.8030404@yandex.ru> <8360yj3rtf.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2mrw952.fsf@gnu.org> <56AD33CF.6060105@yandex.ru> <83h9hu4dy8.fsf@gnu.org> <56AD9EF3.3080104@yandex.ru> <83powh1uwh.fsf@gnu.org> <56AF1A0E.7080802@yandex.ru> <8360y7yo3y.fsf@gnu.org> <56B10AA7.5000103@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454516845 1433 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2016 16:27:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 17:27:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0Gt-0004Pl-HA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36099 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0Gt-0004gg-0z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:27:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0Gn-0004eF-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0Gj-0005t7-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0Gj-0005sx-SD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0Gj-00045Q-Ni for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:27:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22241.145451679315663 (code B ref 22241); Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2016 16:26:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58269 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0GH-00044Z-5Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:26:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57979) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0GF-00044J-DC for 22241@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:26:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0G6-0005lP-S9 for 22241@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:26:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0G6-0005lE-OT; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3146 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aR0G5-00081l-Ue; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:26:22 -0500 In-reply-to: <56B10AA7.5000103@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:59:35 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112346 Archived-At: > Cc: 22241@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:59:35 +0300 > > >> If there's a comma at the end of the current line, the argument list > >> continues on the next one. > > > > ...this. If supporting such split definitions is important, it will > > need a slightly more complex code. > > It's basically a multiline function call. Not sure how frequently that > is used with attr_* in practice, but in our big project at work, just > one out of 190 attr_* declarations is multiline. > > So, it happens, but in the vast majority of cases the arguments stay on > one line. Some projects (like Rails) choose to make several calls > instead, as a stylistic choice. > > I can't really say yet if the lack of support for multiline calls is a > significant problem, but it is an omission. > > Whether to implement it now, or close this bug and wait until another > bug report, is up to you. I implemented that now.