From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 05:36:17 +0200 Message-ID: <83bmx11tn2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8739tm9vzl.fsf@jidanni.org> <87vb5ct1lz.fsf@gnus.org> <2223f654-1e67-4a9a-a471-828fd4078410@default> <87fumokzbp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1bc3x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1hrlek2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg27bjah.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8cvlcmk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360njb9o5.fsf@gnu.org> <877f7zksm0.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1a9msk.fsf@gnu.org> <83vavf73ei.fsf@gnu.org> <8360ne6v1q.fsf@gnu.org> <874m2ujh2v.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480217895 2107 195.159.176.226 (27 Nov 2016 03:38:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 03:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com, johnw@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 6991@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 27 04:38:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqI6-000831-NT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:38:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52743 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqIA-0002YJ-E2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:38:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqI3-0002YD-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqHy-0003yQ-D4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqHy-0003yK-9c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqHy-0004GJ-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 03:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6991.148021783216326 (code B ref 6991); Sun, 27 Nov 2016 03:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2016 03:37:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42813 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqH6-0004FC-Vn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:37:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqH5-0004Em-2r for 6991@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:37:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqGv-0003Th-1Y for 6991@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqGZ-0003IF-A8; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:36:35 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4849 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cAqGN-0002Sz-Cu; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:36:23 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:33:30 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126148 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:33:30 -0500 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Juanma Barranquero , John Wiegley , > Stefan Monnier , 6991@debbugs.gnu.org, > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > > I think it might make sense to hide the bytecode with display > properties, but keep the text itself so that it's not lost when copied > to an email. Text properties won't prevent the hidden text from being copied.