From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34657: 26.1; Some erc hook names lack the expected suffix Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:30:56 +0200 Message-ID: <83bm2xkxbz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <42f6bffbb0e6eb71f87c375a31948970@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <83imx7mdhi.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="24817"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34657@debbugs.gnu.org To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 17:32:31 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gz28F-0006G5-MX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:32:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47011 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz28E-00079G-KG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:32:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40053) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz27x-000785-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz27v-0001Pt-AQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:32:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz27m-0001KD-Bx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz27m-000410-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34657 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34657-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34657.155128507412965 (code B ref 34657); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2019 16:31:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz26z-0003Mm-L8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:31:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz26x-0003GM-88 for 34657@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:31:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz26m-0000gX-CB; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2252 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gz26T-0002PI-7U; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:30:47 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Phil Sainty on Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:01:02 +1300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155854 Archived-At: > Cc: 34657@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Phil Sainty > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:01:02 +1300 > > I've pushed branch fix/bug-34657-erc-hooks for this, and I've used > define-obsolete-variable-alias, but there are problems with the > customize behaviour. > > The first annoyance is that in customize-group erc-hooks the alias > is displayed (albeit slightly differently) as well as the renamed > option. Isn't there some precedent for handling this? If we never did rename a defcustom before, and no simple solution presents itself, I'd rather drop the idea altogether. ERC is a niche package, so it's not a catastrophe if we have exceptions from the rule here. Thanks. (What is the second annoyance?)