From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:50:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83bltd2qr3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eeyd3ul0.fsf@bernoul.li> <2d8a9ed2-4152-338a-06ef-fd69b9d2830f@gmx.at> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="212046"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, 38181@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 15 14:51:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVc0D-000t2Q-SI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:51:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39372 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVc0C-0004ps-KB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVc06-0004pT-Od for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVc05-0001mn-Ty for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVc05-0001mf-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVc05-0005Np-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38181 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38181-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38181.157382583720664 (code B ref 38181); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2019 13:50:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVbzh-0005ND-8j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:50:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVbzf-0005Mz-Un for 38181@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:50:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVbza-00014J-01; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:50:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4383 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iVbzV-0002jj-3c; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:50:27 -0500 In-reply-to: <2d8a9ed2-4152-338a-06ef-fd69b9d2830f@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:03:56 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171668 Archived-At: > From: martin rudalics > Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:03:56 +0100 > > When I evaluate that specification, the scroll bars are screwed up for > all windows and remain so for all unselected windows. Doesn't happen here, FWIW.