From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38996: 26.3; Missing documentation for `list-at-point' function in elisp manual. Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 20:17:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83blrdbyow.fsf@gnu.org> References: <856796400.8608681.1578505816990.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <856796400.8608681.1578505816990@mail.yahoo.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="239512"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38996@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark Harig Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 08 19:17:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFtK-000Thi-Sj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 19:17:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47762 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFtJ-0002kN-E5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:17:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFt9-0002fH-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFt8-0002UW-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFt8-0002UI-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFt8-0005Vl-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38996 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix notabug Original-Received: via spool by 38996-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38996.157850741721169 (code B ref 38996); Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38996) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2020 18:16:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFt2-0005VM-SS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:16:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFt1-0005V8-Ay for 38996@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:16:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFsw-0002Ip-4D; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:16:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1894 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ipFsv-0005HL-A5; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:16:49 -0500 In-reply-to: <856796400.8608681.1578505816990@mail.yahoo.com> (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:174373 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:50:16 +0000 (UTC) > From: Mark Harig via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > OK. Going forward, how are end users to know which functions have not > been documented on purpose and which have not been documented due to > oversight? I don't think there should be a way. If you think something should be there, and you have a good reason, feel free to report it as a bug. At worst, you will hear an explanation why it's not an omission; no harm done.