From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40919: 27.0.91; next-error-select-buffer does not always behave as documented Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 05:40:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83bln5rbah.fsf@gnu.org> References: <53913bd9-2bdc-0f70-f7b4-744283e0512f@ieee.org> <87d07rmb6j.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhau5bfw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <66f63b16-307a-919c-1d25-60ff63f92ae6@ieee.org> <87bln8u3xq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <851cd382-4b2e-447a-2212-919c8a4ce908@ieee.org> <87d07lykkd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="6669"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 40919@debbugs.gnu.org, tspiteri@ieee.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 03 04:41:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4Z3-0001eL-94 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 04:41:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4Z2-00083O-BJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4Yw-00083G-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4Yw-0002YZ-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4Yw-0004tv-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 02:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40919 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40919-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40919.158847363818802 (code B ref 40919); Sun, 03 May 2020 02:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40919) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2020 02:40:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4YY-0004tC-6D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:40:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4YW-0004sz-Ld for 40919@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:40:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44099) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4YP-0001eD-W5; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:40:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1617 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jV4YP-0008RV-Eg; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:40:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d07lykkd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 03 May 2020 02:38:10 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179562 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 02:38:10 +0300 > Cc: 40919@debbugs.gnu.org > > It seems there is no right answer suitable for all users. So I propose > to add more options. > > Eli, do you agree with adding more options to `next-error-find-buffer-function' > in emacs-27? > > Currently it has one option that defines one of possible behaviors existed > in older versions. Now we need to add other option for compatibility > with pre-27 versions. > > Then users of emacs-27 could decide whether they want to keep > the old behavior or use the new. I think the time for adding new options to Emacs 27 has come and gone long ago. We should defer that to future releases.