From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41321: 27.0.91; Emacs aborts due to invalid pseudovector objects Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 17:26:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83blmg2ggi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zha8cgpi.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1vibmyj.fsf@gnu.org> <83imgublku.fsf@gnu.org> <831rncjuwf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv082mm1.fsf@gnu.org> <83lflk2l07.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="106341"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41321@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 22 16:27:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8dp-000Ra8-3w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:27:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8do-0008D2-5V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8da-0008CO-Rz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8da-0000cR-I0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8da-0001WR-FB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41321.15901576165840 (code B ref 41321); Fri, 22 May 2020 14:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2020 14:26:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59961 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8dU-0001W7-Ds for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:26:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8dT-0001Vv-8a for 41321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:26:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8dN-0000c1-Jn; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1196 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jc8dM-0005Li-PD; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:26:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Fri, 22 May 2020 14:04:03 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180772 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:04:03 +0000 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , 41321@debbugs.gnu.org > > I don't think posting the disassembled code for > `signal_before_change' can hurt, since there's no easy way for > anyone else to reproduce it. I see this on two different systems where Emacs was compiled with two different versions of GCC. So if you want to see the disassembly, any 32-bit GCC will do, I think.