From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41242: Port feature/native-comp to Windows - Reduce the number of files probed when finding a lisp file. Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 18:02:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83blm1eciw.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="122823"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: nicolasbertolo@gmail.com, 41242@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 02 17:04:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8Sd-000VpY-R0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:04:15 +0200 Original-Received: from [::1] (port=39698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8Sc-0004P4-QB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8SR-0004K0-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8SR-0002ng-8D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8SR-0007jL-3Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:04:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:04:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41242 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41242-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41242.159111019729628 (code B ref 41242); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:04:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41242) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2020 15:03:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8Rg-0007hn-Oj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39456) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8Ra-0007hW-SP for 41242@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8RV-00028R-0a; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3784 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jg8RU-0006Ww-As; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:03:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Mon, 01 Jun 2020 19:24:43 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181402 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: 41242@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 19:24:43 +0000 > > In which folders are we going to search if we do (load "...a/path/foo.eln")? > > I believe in this case we should search the file only in "...a/path/" > because the user really want to load this specific file. Am I correct? Isn't that already so when we look for *.elc files? > That said IMO this logic is sufficiently complex to deserve a minimum of > testing to make sure we have it under control. Not sure if the best > place is files-tests.el or comp-tests.el. > > Maybe Eli likes to gives his opinion on this last point and on the patch > in general. I think the logic should be consistent with how we search for Lisp files in general.