From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14957: 24.3.50; Flyspell language visible in mode line Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:45:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83bli33x8h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y58teatq.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <87wqmfz96x.fsf@web.de> <86a9hevcyl.fsf@somewhere.org> <87mwled1jc.fsf@web.de> <87v9gbf9rf.fsf@gnus.org> <87bli3xh8c.fsf@web.de> <87r1qzdssi.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36012"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, sva-news@mygooglest.com, 14957@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 18 17:51:51 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIfs-000985-2k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:51:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIfr-0004bK-36 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIZL-0008Pg-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIZK-00079v-5M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIZK-0003HC-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14957 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 14957-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14957.160044389812574 (code B ref 14957); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14957) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 15:44:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIZG-0003Gj-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:44:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIZE-0003GU-EM for 14957@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIZ8-00078p-7u; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4605 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIZ6-0005kR-Rj; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:44:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r1qzdssi.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:10:53 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188331 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:10:53 +0200 > Cc: Sebastien Vauban , 14957@debbugs.gnu.org > > Michael Heerdegen writes: > > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > >> Perhaps putting it in the Flyspell lighter? So it'd be > >> > >> ... (Text Fly[br] Fill) > > > > Yes, I think so. What's a reasonable alternative at all? > > The language could be put in the mode-line-process position, which is > ahead of the modes: > > ... [br] (Text Fly Fill) That's sub-optimal IMO. I like the "Fly[br]" variant much better.