From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:36:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83bldb1zi9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sg6oyzi6.wl-me@enzu.ru> <9020EC26-6AC7-4316-B5FB-11A27AB61481@gnu.org> <87sg6o54nh.fsf@igel.home> <87o8hb6hpj.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1718"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46111@debbugs.gnu.org, me@enzu.ru, p.stephani2@gmail.com To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 16:39:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QRT-0000J0-Gp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:39:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QRS-0006F9-Jf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:39:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QOs-0004DI-36 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QOr-0007CX-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QOr-0001EE-I5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46111 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46111-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46111.16116754014691 (code B ref 46111); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46111) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2021 15:36:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42447 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QOX-0001Db-E8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QOV-0001DO-O2 for 46111@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:36:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QOO-00072M-IH; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4665 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l4QOB-0006rG-TH; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:36:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87o8hb6hpj.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:49:44 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198626 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: 46111@debbugs.gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com, me@enzu.ru > Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:49:44 +0100 > > On Jan 26 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > On January 26, 2021 1:17:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> On Jan 26 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> > >> > It's definitely legal, as it doesn't violate any laws... > >> > >> It violates the laws of C. > > > > We call that "invalid" not "illegal". > > It's still a bug. That goes without saying: a crash is always a bug.