From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46702: Link symbol name in Help Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:31:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83blcavlzp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874ki4kuy8.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7gw0zf.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2ffeqh0.fsf@gnus.org> <83im6jv4we.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29312"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 46702@debbugs.gnu.org To: Peter Dean Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 23 16:33:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZgU-0007W5-4I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:33:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48978 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZgT-0007ND-6L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZgM-0007N5-O4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZgM-0005c7-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZgM-0000YC-6q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 46702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46702.16140943381109 (code B ref 46702); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2021 15:32:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZfe-0000HZ-0T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:32:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZfc-0000CK-7n for 46702@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:32:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZfV-0005Am-Vs; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:32:10 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2172 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lEZfP-0002u2-OA; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:32:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Peter Dean on Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:09:26 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200657 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:09:26 +0000 > From: Peter Dean > Cc: "larsi@gnus.org" , "46702@debbugs.gnu.org" <46702@debbugs.gnu.org> > > On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:28 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > I'm not sure that's a good idea: "Documentation:" ends in a colon, so > > the text should follow it. Otherwise it might look unrelated. > > What do you think of Lars' idea of removing that line altogether, since > it's obvious the user is looking at the documentation (the user invoked > the command)? That would work in simple cases, such as this one, but we also have variables whose value takes a lot of space when printed, and in those cases we have Documentation: Value: E.g., try "C-h v char-script-table RET".