From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33847: 27.0.50; emacsclient does not find server socket Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:34:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83bl6qwdw8.fsf__28753.0688963429$1627230979$gmane$org@gnu.org> References: <8a6fc59c-08b3-e274-4fb1-74674c79540a@cs.ucla.edu> <87eeo27v6k.fsf@gnus.org> <83lfi79klf.fsf@gnu.org> <831rjya5yy.fsf@gnu.org> <8333533f-08ec-acd4-2fbf-f06e78591e98@cs.ucla.edu> <83v9h99awv.fsf@gnu.org> <878s1yjy20.fsf@gnus.org> <83lf5y2t78.fsf@gnu.org> <878s1yi8jc.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7gm2r4j.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnphe06g.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1fpdzuy.fsf@gnus.org> <838s1w1b7x.fsf@gnu.org> <5f457b50-c1bd-4856-33c7-f85edf111bd0@cs.ucla.edu> <83v950yv7i.fsf@gnu.org> <5d2f6394-2fc0-e20a-9018-0ea59f399ba2@cs.ucla.edu> <83a6maykcf.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17197"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: teika@gmx.com, 33847@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnulib@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, ulm@gentoo.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 25 18:36:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h6n-0004G4-JA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 18:36:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h6m-00075C-Lw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h6g-00074p-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h6g-0003OZ-EB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h6g-0000im-AO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33847 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 33847-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33847.16272309092710 (code B ref 33847); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2021 16:35:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h5m-0000ha-6j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h5j-0000h1-Dz for 33847@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h5d-0002bq-Bi; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:34:57 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1851 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7h5c-00071c-Vl; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 12:34:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 25 Jul 2021 09:22:06 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210722 Archived-At: > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, teika@gmx.com, 33847@debbugs.gnu.org, ulm@gentoo.org, > Gnulib bugs > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 09:22:06 -0700 > > On 7/24/21 11:32 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> No modules are affected by the --disable-year2038 option on MS-Windows. > > It turns out that I was wrong about that. (I don't normally look at the > MS-Windows part of Gnulib and misunderstood some of the code I was > reading.) Please see gnulib/m4/year2038.m4 for details. This file is in > the patches I sent, or you can see it directly here: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/m4/year2038.m4 > > This code knows about MS-Windows, Mingw, _USE_32BIT_TIME_T, > __MINGW_USE_VC2005_COMPAT, and so forth, and attempts to do the right > thing. As near as I can make out it should work for the scenario you > describe, but I don't use MS-Windows so I could well be wrong. If I'm > wrong and this code doesn't do what you want, I suggest contacting > bug-gnulib to alert Bruno Haible, who wrote that part of the code. I'll > cc bug-gnulib so that Bruno sees this email. (Bruno, this discussion is > at .) Thanks, I will take a look, although I now understand it isn't urgent, since Emacs doesn't (yet) use the year2038 module. > > So therefore my question seems to be even more important than I > > thought, and I'm still asking which Gnulib modules are affected by > > this, because I'd need to audit them carefully to see whether the > > 32-bit MS-Windows build with mingw.org's MinGW could be affected. > > There should be no need to audit, because Gnulib still supports > platforms that have only 32-bit time_t. > > Gnulib is agnostic about time_t width, and is supposed to work even if > time_t is 40 bits (which it is on a very few mainframes) or any other > width. We regularly test it only on 32- and 64-bit time_t, though. Thanks, that's good to know.