From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83bl0awbqq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czn8etuz.7.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tugkkfid.fsf@gnus.org> <83fss44rbn.fsf@gnu.org> <875yt0ipre.fsf@gnus.org> <834k8k3za3.fsf@gnu.org> <874k8jfloo.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgqb18hq.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqb6tcm.fsf@gnus.org> <87tue3y96e.fsf@gnus.org> <83fspny8fp.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmory859.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee57y7xz.fsf@gnu.org> <87lezfy70y.fsf@gnus.org> <83czkry6jw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7a3y5no.fsf@gnus.org> <87czkry3h8.fsf@gnus.org> <835yqjy26h.fsf@gnu.org> <878rveybyf.fsf@gnus.org> <49EACC4C-E21E-4123-A3D2-901958CF7DC4@gnu.org> <87mtju76pp.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36503"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 17:48:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VB8-0009PX-H3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 17:48:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VB7-0007Ud-6L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:48:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VAp-0007UP-9t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:48:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VAn-00049T-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VAn-0005MD-U2; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:48:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 51733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51733.164243805620442 (code B ref 51733); Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2022 16:47:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VAG-0005JF-Sc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36374) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VAE-0005J1-UQ for 51733@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:47:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=42046 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VA7-00047A-Ni; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:47:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=gujxyiUyfPP17D/pM2ixP/dozHLrF24VqTwbgCEvQYk=; b=XEl6ylXZPdkx yIzuRHkmy92FXEyau1orpYSIUZqHU9SLRJ8snnEzWfov9qUanXC841kIiVHRG0+oXsU2XR1yv0j3k PrquEUwgkJcJyXVwgKBK5AjM3NGOeMYx3E5phG2FNiD0UfzhrvWiXZa2eEMfHmb3pvqArapdbfCe3 o8ijb8yGT4zjGvwAODWqjV6TwKfM+LKbIrb8dMKrB5gsrX/iwpb0gah0w60TXdzU6PClgAavU8B9+ CLVQgFsPoE5GvvgH0dg9qZ/H7X40CrwZ39t8lPj/KG2W6KpoRyU9SR1FQF7L4Qjz94j2QigbM0UA7 aU0oYLHInDzAVA4xY6MeXQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1236 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9VA7-0004sv-Nq; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:47:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mtju76pp.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:54:58 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224451 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:54:58 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Yes, I understand the general concern, but I'm asking how serious is > > this in practice. Can you tell? > > I don't know how to quantity that. We're talking about security > mechanisms, and they should be reliable. Well, now that I know the answer, I don't think it's hard to quantify. But maybe I'm missing something. > (But, yes, the differences are massive, especially in the Asian parts of > the data.) I don't think I understand what you mean by "the Asian parts". Do you mean the CJK parts where we lump several scripts together into 'han' and 'kana'? > It's impossible to implement the Unicode security recommendations based > on the Blocks.txt data -- it's that simple. Can you tell more about why it is impossible? If it's a relatively simple issue of "translating" the Unicode script names into ours, then it should be quite simple. Since you say it's impossible, I guess there's some factor(s) here that I miss?