From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53894: 27.2; Clipboard copy -> C-y -> M-y -> Same clipboard copy does not push to kill ring Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 09:25:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83bkxuczv1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pmnttw78.fsf@yahoo.com> <87leyhtv9q.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wni0str6.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h78j6bz0.fsf@yahoo.com> <87czj73xw8.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wnhfoy5h.fsf@hotmail.com> <87sfs233lx.fsf@yahoo.com> <83fso1lsjf.fsf@gnu.org> <871qzlw50r.fsf@yahoo.com> <87sfs0u6n2.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ilswu0wi.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24264"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, larsi@gnus.org, 53894@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ignacio Casso Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 07:27:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdPs-0006C9-F7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 07:27:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdPr-0002Ig-E0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:27:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdPa-0002H0-Tl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdPa-00033t-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdPa-00057e-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 06:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53894 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53894-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53894.164818957819633 (code B ref 53894); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 06:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2022 06:26:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdOs-00056b-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdOm-00056K-RI for 53894@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=33352 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdOh-0002tr-GL; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:26:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/bTKAoFy9UfJcZVTF81MoU9lHdcIqf63uEsfpspz6DI=; b=HZsWmW7W26wj MHfgpMDXxib4XetDRbfsEdQnLyMKrgH2OEXsZXK4i6uHkqDVoEL5/I1xXRmtnsHQnSif+odZSw8Dq AXLWi+w49B9gVQh696RK0i0mMiW671qhfZ6H3XNo9D8Snl976hWVcb0675v59OCrDFzzf/RsFtgt5 OFh5q6DeKCCDhteR8Kmt9r14I8UR0XfRrs5FK63Lnal6LixjZsqcsYzMlsHPZITpQTRzGLyWPnxPu pJu8iVIkGstIu6rilpFC4VR/z0IKLE/K077KvGx7wFBXGX8GWtnrNV48KB9hcG3g3cX5hGbFscl8L c8YcbdVyaIWjoMyE8zjbWA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2480 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXdOa-0004Vp-0y; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 02:26:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Ignacio Casso on Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:59:50 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228909 Archived-At: > From: Ignacio Casso > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, 53894@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:59:50 +0100 > > > >>> Ok, here is the final patch, and a suggested commit message. I've > >>> initiated the paperwork for the copyright assignment, I will let you > >>> know when it is done. > >> > >> Thanks, I look forward to it. > > > > No news yet. I have not even got an answer. Do you know how long it > > usually takes? I'll send another email just in case the previous was > > lost. > > They sent me the form no long after I sent this email, after Eli or Lars > intervened and asked himself. Not sure who of the two was since I seem > to have deleted those emails, but thank you for that. > > However I've had no news again since I sent them the signed form. They > were supposed to sign it after me and send me a copy, but I haven't > heard from them since. This was two weeks ago. After one week I sent > another email asking how long should I expect the process to take, and > now one week after they haven't replied yet that email either. > > I'd keep insisting but I read the following in > https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html: > > > The assignment process does not always go smoothly, and it has happened > > several times that it gets stuck or forgotten at the FSF. The contact at > > the FSF for this is: copyright-clerk AT fsf DOT org > > > > Emails from the paper submitter have been ignored in the past, but an > > email from the maintainers of Org mode has usually fixed such cases > > within a few days. > > So could one of you send them another email, please? Done.