From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63831: Accidentally submit two bug reports for the same topic Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2023 08:38:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83bkhv7pon.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bkhyawp8.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40669"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63831@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Amritpal Singh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 04 07:38:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gRZ-000APg-C4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 07:38:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gRI-00046f-Kd; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gRH-00046J-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gRG-0003Mx-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gRG-00034P-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63831 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 63831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63831.168585704411738 (code B ref 63831); Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2023 05:37:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44699 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gQd-00033F-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gQc-000333-97 for 63831@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gQX-0003JS-2B; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:37:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=7Gh195FnZRjRLMQ0kEe/aR1vUoI+PVD3cJi32Rok3Q0=; b=khvGEq0TjWk0 ZpWhIYw+Iq4dxmmAnrxrqAvls5s6MXXUDB1LCkGgG046xNgD9phGt1SlVOJBKScX84B71dFF4aOCc 1u7fmBumIQywPynlqqc70sT/4xEXO7j+sEx+OaAuDi1vVesQuo6veCZZubnZCqZblyZZPGO+80p3F pAZ1szM8amg5ndklcl7lT3taV3o02B0p9ZoPZsO6DFZm0GRoiQDVhCdjeMHtV/jIH1hZf5U8AZ2Ov LQEMsl7BurdxMrZ4vZyTjzbe85D2IOgPqaORwiotu8wijEA3NapvpKvqAr29CHLu/Jy0Z9KcMr56J m8wdcvzcM0DvwstFxOteBQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5gQM-0002mX-M5; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 01:37:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Amritpal Singh on Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:16:49 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262898 Archived-At: > From: Amritpal Singh > Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:16:49 +0530 > Cc: "eliz@gnu.org" , 63831@debbugs.gnu.org > > While we're on the topic of bug report moderation, is it possible that the > current human moderation might be a little ineffective? Feel free to volunteer to help, in order to improve the quality and the timeliness of the moderation. > We've observed that me accidentally submitting a duplicate report > made it through human filters, and I had notice another instance of > a "spam" email, where no subject or body was present. See: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2023-06/msg00107.html It isn't spam. The sender is an Emacs contributor. > I'm not trying to impugn someone else's ability of moderating but the current > system seems a little ineffective. Also I'd like to apologize if my > language/wording > seems abrasive towards the moderation team as this is no way an insult to their > work but rather a lack of implementation of better systems by management. I'm not sure I understand what you are suggesting here. What better system did you have in mind? (In any case, discussing this as part of a specific bug report is wrong; this should be taken to emacs-devel instead.) > I'd also like to draw attention towards the actual bug+patch report > #63831, it's been > close to two days now and such a small change could easily be merged into HEAD. > But the bug does seem low priority (even though breaking) to me as well so > I would not question the maintainers' decision to prioritize critical > bugs over this. That bug is indeed low priority, and the change will go to master, which makes it even lower priority (since we are in the process of pretesting Emacs 29.1). The bug report is in my queue, and two days is really way too short to ring the alarm bells about such a minor issue.