From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53910: [External] : bug#53910: 29.0.50; context-menu-mode breaks help in read-only buffers Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:29:18 +0100 Message-ID: <83b84854-8aec-ed45-3313-06a240f89ad0@gmx.at> References: <20220210001600.vjiuqzoiuuzzj54c.ref@Ergus> <20220210001600.vjiuqzoiuuzzj54c@Ergus> <87mtizdwrv.fsf@gnus.org> <86y22jxfsq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o83f7y3x.fsf@gnus.org> <86iltmpn0a.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86wni13ifi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86pmns10kw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5d2c2af9-d011-583b-e9c1-985bbc2378c2@gmx.at> <861r06vbos.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <868ru9jnp6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <41b85df6-305f-fe6b-f575-0ff9db616eb9@gmx.at> <83a6enyrdh.fsf@gnu.org> <54befa08-3bce-1d86-4e8b-e3cc4246da0b@gmx.at> <83y226ydnn.fsf@gnu.org> <70c9a41a-4205-bc13-48c9-86dce0d2a4e9@gmx.at> <86k0dpfnvj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <9cfb3de2-e73c-4f96-fe46-94dbc66386de@gmx.at> <86czjesyui.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22847"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 53910@debbugs.gnu.org, spacibba@aol.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 23 11:05:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nMoWi-0005gX-Fw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:05:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nMoWg-0001ue-Nt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 05:05:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nMnyT-0005PA-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nMnyE-0005L3-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:30:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMnyE-0005ft-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53910 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 53910-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53910.164560857621703 (code B ref 53910); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53910) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2022 09:29:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMnxo-0005dz-JB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:40227) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMnxk-0005dk-Ey for 53910@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:29:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1645608560; bh=kz1aB0zJ3hnxiWB6oDuTJQSd9TOWPWWPY5dl7zel9vU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=gN40RIpBk85G3Yw3XDS2arnOpTZKtyMlc+L8mnQb2Y7FKPGsp4k4jGe7zP1BVtQt3 jkJzwcQ/VWj5h+FDGB4NyZY9EJr8ME2FKKUOeyRzpibtleGWyPL7TmN2Ogx7BNMNy2 gOkNFF/dgFoV5L40biAT1EbaayUeP/E2iPmwcIgA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.142.97.235]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N1OXT-1oOcqh2Aqx-012tOj; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:29:20 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86czjesyui.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:2GNo2bYKIyvKWVsj2S81QOHGdICY3/BdnXXjKtn/9dyXu0eKodK Z1C9+0qn+mGpVGAbQnXfqeb+8sEtBaIBYLupiYq7JNxHLVdZSxnO6wAmjApN/LL/YEAVx0q ixbZbA4aqTgBrya+asNh/q+dGYh9SW6hSntmhFhgjx+PAXjGdguSefGumz4NVWIIlXcSNKU V33VB6TPqWqQ/8myrLKMQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:1u9j4spF1SQ=:RwF+CirBJkt0pHWecXj3J0 yCpobr/37fDiLv2Y+z767ur/LB++mlDfyVCnFZ6uouCX0+QMjzQFMPfCHePElGkSwRb1h3tzu L3Na99MESb8K9dAZ1BMMhUbu2gY++VRnQriHRh1KOK2hNKAR30TvnLBz6DRPdSPL/8/w4XE7o LGzy7VEvzEYZdSRqqscM9Lcx8P0B2B8olU4VDn/APNQMSp06lyTnjtDtgiqCEr3pYNBmCxLGf auvXzJZrKSav1LkCepJGhWzDQXc4fgCX1++GHjOrlulvamDRgiJXvluFX5BBxZLsjwze5rKRJ JfnNFcnoiCWdWs7OCJjjl3S4hTLfb/dJSnnP/S99mWTLHQci6QIeGx80Erl8MCTK7tzN6reQg TIow9mh5EeZDoDhwpCDT8DhrckyHD+zsOPpIjZYLxUCZkdErEQGLC2f7fPwNuE0ZEKkqFqcYH PIcO3acJTp+lDHrXO+U5LvhzPr9+DuaMcFJD0j4PFgn0S/XWXvkCYzX0Bsj1syIogIa+hCGXS 01wIbmHjyLA6OKcapwBFvC5OLqXKuJ4urbBDGshXq7IdlnyxWd3SzVj9Ip5cfZ2O89tCo73M3 +98OqTONlI7urTrt6kCyc8FTPNy8SqgL1wOFaYpfMhD5ufLPZsJv+2dHsUzoTKti/8D8E54Qr KteBTcvCAhoM8cTe2L2x+3wY3PzhXowaH14jvGv1N4JaZjYKX9rf4QqitazjBjJLCEHu55Hwg jgvFYpmz7MV5hYxvF9s1YFRMPTE7SxUg7ii+pvBxJgs/9Lv+VU74s0BegjeLA9GArh5i9ieH X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:227486 Archived-At: >> Can you tell how burying a buffer affects the next C-x sequence >> you type? > > 'bury-buffer' should remove the buffer from the C-x sequence > of previous buffers. Completely? And add it to the sequence of next buffers? We could provide an option for that. Personally, I'd profoundly dislike that some application could remove a buffer from a window's list of previous buffers by burying it. And then we would have to decide whether 'unbury-buffer' should switch to the last buffer in the selected window's buffer list or to the last buffer in the selected frame's buffer list. martin