From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19513: shift-select-mode fails to be fully buffer-local Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:15:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83a916qd8g.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422252975 1151 80.91.229.3 (26 Jan 2015 06:16:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19513@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kelly Dean Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 26 07:16:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcy2-0004FY-Jl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:16:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40099 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcy1-0002lh-PO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcxx-0002kj-M2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcxu-0003lk-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:16:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcxu-0003lg-AU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcxu-0008UJ-1g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19513 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19513-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19513.142225295732614 (code B ref 19513); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19513) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2015 06:15:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcxp-0008Ty-7s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:15:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45197) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFcxm-0008Ti-TY for 19513@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:15:55 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIR00H00TC28Y00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 19513@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:15:45 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIR00HAFTE58N10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:15:45 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98742 Archived-At: > From: Kelly Dean > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 04:16:09 +0000 > Cc: 19513@debbugs.gnu.org > > Stefan Monnier wrote: > > We could backport this patch to `emacs-24'. > > Wouldn't that only matter if there's going to be another 24 release? Yes, and there's going to be one, hopefully very soon. Too many bugs in 24.4 were fixed since its release, so a bugfix release is in order.