From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19865: tar-untar-buffer: should honor default-directory Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:44:22 +0200 Message-ID: <83a90gwfpl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a90gd91b.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87fva8bi4v.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83h9uowhxh.fsf@gnu.org> <877fvkbdpw.fsf@violet.siamics.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423935938 16227 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2015 17:45:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19865@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Shmakov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 14 18:45:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgmK-00029A-Bp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:45:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60666 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgmJ-0005Nm-Ny for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgmB-0005Dp-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgm6-0004z2-Ir for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgm6-0004ym-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgm6-0004zX-4R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19865.142393587219137 (code B ref 19865); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2015 17:44:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44100 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMglb-0004ya-O5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:44:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:47618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMglZ-0004yN-Kr for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:44:30 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJR00000VXC4N00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:44:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJR00MY5VXXZ880@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:44:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <877fvkbdpw.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99402 Archived-At: > From: Ivan Shmakov > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:32:59 +0000 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:57:36 +0000 > > >> Well, let’s see if I can reword the report. > > > If all you want is for me to stop bothering you with comments, all > > you need is just ask. There's no need to have the bug reports > > reworded around my comments. > > All I want is to get the issue (that is: the misbehavior of > tar-untar-buffer with respect to the tar-mode buffer value of > default-directory) fixed. > > From where I stand, the shortest way there seems to get either > of my two patches approved (that is: at least a single OK and no > NAKs), so that I can safely push it. If there’s any other way I > should be aware of – I’d like to hear about it. > > My understanding is that the Stefan’s comment is an OK (for a > former patch), while your request for “someone third to resolve > the tie” is a NAK (please correct me if it’s not.) It is only a NAK if it's respected. I cannot force anyone here to do anything, I don;t have that power. > I appreciate the comments regarding the possible new “explicit > destination directory” feature, and I guess I can work on a > possible implementation once /this/ issue – and also #19481 – > are fixed. However, I believe that such a new feature is no > substitute for a proper fix to this bug. I obviously disagree, but whatever.