From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24520: 25.1.50; calccard.tex has somewhat unclear licensing Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:02:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8d0he1p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wpi2l9yp.fsf@Sam-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83h98keben.fsf@gnu.org> <83vawt1zay.fsf@gnu.org> <81k2d7bvhh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83h983nr67.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgx7qxjb.fsf@gnu.org> <834m3urfbo.fsf@gnu.org> <83h97pn8hh.fsf@gnu.org> <8337j8mo2g.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvh5ceym.fsf@gnu.org> <838tsncprj.fsf@gnu.org> <837f86hxwt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479229473 6456 195.159.176.226 (15 Nov 2016 17:04:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: naesten@gmail.com, 24520@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 18:04:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h9R-0006n7-Ny for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:04:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47682 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h9V-0008VM-4J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:04:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43205) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h8W-0007rH-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h8Q-0006En-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:03:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h8Q-0006Eb-Lh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h8Q-0003qe-Ec for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24520 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24520-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24520.147922936914768 (code B ref 24520); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24520) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2016 17:02:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h8D-0003q8-Cf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52066) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h8A-0003pv-1S for 24520@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:02:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h81-0005xw-Pr for 24520@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h81-0005xr-NJ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3223 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c6h7u-0002a8-2M; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:02:30 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:25 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125720 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: rgm@gnu.org, naesten@gmail.com, 24520@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:25 -0500 > > > I don't understand why should we treat these files differently from > > any other file in the tree. They all speak about "GNU Emacs". > > The reason it seems good to me to change those words for the refcards > is that the license exception, and the way the tex output files > are handled, is quite different from what we permit for GNU Emacs itself. > > I think the situation will be clearer if we don't say these are > "part of GNU Emacs." OK, done.