From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27526: 25.1; Nonconformance to Unicode bidirectionality algorithm due to paragraph separator Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 20:46:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83a84knlh9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83inj8nt0h.fsf@gnu.org> <83eftwnpk0.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmp0no78.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499190435 10458 195.159.176.226 (4 Jul 2017 17:47:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 17:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27526@debbugs.gnu.org To: Itai Berli Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 04 19:47:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRui-00029h-6r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 19:47:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRun-0006Vo-EB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRuh-0006Vj-AH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRug-0001Et-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRug-0001Eh-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRug-0000Zy-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27526 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27526-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27526.14991904182215 (code B ref 27526); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2017 17:46:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRub-0000Zf-RI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:46:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRua-0000ZR-6d for 27526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRuR-00016w-V8 for 27526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRuR-00016q-Rq; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2275 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dSRuR-0005Ek-3G; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:46:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Itai Berli on Tue, 4 Jul 2017 20:01:25 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134179 Archived-At: > From: Itai Berli > Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 20:01:25 +0300 > > You did, but it would be much nicer for a noob like me to be able to simply type in my .emacs file something > like: (bidi.markers.visible false), or maybe even > > (bidi.markers.ALM null) > (bidi.markers.RLM ⊲) > (bidi.markers.LRM ⊳) Sorry, I don't see why the exact way how to customize this is so important. glyphless-char-display-control is a user-level customizable variable, not some obscure feature that requires Lisp programming to tailor it to your needs. > Isn't the Bidi feature important and complicated enough to merit its own tailored set of customizable > parameters? It does have its private customizations, but this one isn't one of them, I don't see why it should be. The characters of the Cf general category are quite a few, and Emacs handled them all the same, because they all have the same nature.