From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35507: Gnus mojibakifies UTF-8 text/x-patch attachments from Thunderbird Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 20:34:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83a7g6qds9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <44a26585-7980-378c-9262-a567ddd3e617@cs.ucla.edu> <865zqv3tc2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="3222"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35507@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 01 19:39:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hLtCx-0000jt-CD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 19:39:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLtCw-0006Xu-Cf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt9G-0003zH-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt9F-0003iK-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt9F-0003iA-Su for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt9F-0002VF-K9; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 17:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 35507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35507.15567321159560 (code B ref 35507); Wed, 01 May 2019 17:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2019 17:35:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44816 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt8U-0002U8-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51759) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt8T-0002Tt-NO for 35507@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt8N-0002ey-N8; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1305 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hLt8K-0000u1-3u; Wed, 01 May 2019 13:35:06 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Pluim on Wed, 01 May 2019 17:22:19 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158590 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 17:22:19 +0200 > Cc: 35507@debbugs.gnu.org > > I think utf-8 is a good fallback if the message doesnʼt specify a > charset. Itʼs not going to produce any worse effects than what we have > now. What considerations led you to that conclusion?