From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:53:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83a7b3w34h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9tsv65b.fsf@gnus.org> <87ef0grneg.fsf@gnus.org> <83r24fwjwm.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238059"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 37420@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 13:54:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC3g-000znq-VJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:54:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC3f-0000zY-Lx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC3X-0000xq-J8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC3W-0007E0-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC3W-0007Dl-Fb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC3W-0002rr-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37420 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37420-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37420.156872120810980 (code B ref 37420); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37420) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 11:53:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC2y-0002r2-20 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC2w-0002qq-6M for 37420@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:53:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC2q-0006RU-JW; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:53:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2197 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC2p-00082k-Ot; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:53:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:09:25 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166625 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:09:25 +0200 > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 37420@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Should we perhaps do something to help those who know this under the > > name "SHA1"? > > Is there any risk that some users believe that these would be two > different algorithms? My guess would be no, but I might be wrong. I have no idea, but I personally didn't even know SHA1 has another name, let alone a more "official" one.