From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38497: 27.0.50; Frame is not rendered when frame-resize-pixelwise it 't Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 13:40:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83a77v6spt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wobbjlm0.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <7caf72bb-1dc0-6e6d-430a-5c28295fb80c@gmx.at> <87tv6fjco6.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20b3b02b-8018-49cd-4ab3-702ccf9e1c28@gmx.at> <87d0d0i7hk.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <25861c90-bdb5-e873-7da7-22a8d997f4b6@gmx.at> <871rtghy2v.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <2975a018-4c5c-4da4-f236-8eb4338a9829@gmx.at> <878sngvhaf.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <13a1e840-7ca3-fb70-e773-de12089bd97e@gmx.at> <8736domoza.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <94dc09f8-6ef4-f493-db7b-52b0d218f715@gmx.at> <87zhfwkwb5.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <647006dc-42e1-a242-4fda-2f129943fc98@gmx.at> <87v9qjl00x.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="172040"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38497@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 14 12:41:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5nM-000icq-0c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 12:41:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58440 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5nK-0006FU-UD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:41:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5nE-0006Cp-KG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5nC-0007xo-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5nC-0007wu-4B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5nB-0006Qm-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 11:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38497.157632363824676 (code B ref 38497); Sat, 14 Dec 2019 11:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2019 11:40:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5mo-0006Pw-JL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:40:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53077) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5mm-0006Pi-AE for 38497@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:40:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5mg-0006aP-Jo; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:40:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2303 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ig5mf-00025i-5n; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 06:40:29 -0500 In-reply-to: <87v9qjl00x.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:38:38 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173326 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:38:38 +0800 > > > OK. So we have a simpler scenario now. From the screenshot I cannot > > understand where redrawing hangs. Is input still functional in such a > > mangled frame? Does evaluating (redisplay t) change anything? > > The input is functional. I can split windows with C-x 2/3. The frame is > partially redrawn (just the scroll bars, as in the screenshot). > Blindly running (redisplay t) does nothing. How about "M-x redraw-display RET" -- does that redraw the frame?