From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39082: Inconsolata v3.000 has too wide spacing Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 19:52:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83a76s7eaf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83eew47kix.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0bo7gwn.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="221166"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 39082@debbugs.gnu.org To: greselin.andrea@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 12 18:53:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhQM-000qvu-NM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 18:53:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40610 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhQG-0002bn-5H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:53:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhQ8-0002bB-6Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhQ7-00058u-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:53:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhQ7-00058Q-4Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhQ7-0003AA-3I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:53:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 17:53:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39082 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39082-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39082.157885156412109 (code B ref 39082); Sun, 12 Jan 2020 17:53:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39082) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2020 17:52:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57906 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhPo-00039D-AB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:52:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39446) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhPn-00038u-0B for 39082@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:52:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhPh-0003io-R4; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1559 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iqhPh-0002rv-71; Sun, 12 Jan 2020 12:52:37 -0500 In-reply-to: <83d0bo7gwn.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 12 Jan 2020 18:56:08 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:174514 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 18:56:08 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 39082@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 17:37:58 +0200 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Cc: 39082@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Sadly, I have no idea how to go about investigating this problem > > further, maybe someone else does? > > One idea is to look at the character glyph metric we get from the font > here: An easier way to get at the character glyph metrics is like this: M-: (font-get-glyphs (font-at 1) 1 2) RET This should show the glyph metrics of the font glyph used to display the character at buffer position 1. (Change 1 to any other buffer position to report on a character there, and then change 2 to 1 more than that position, for example 100 and 101 for the character at buffer position 100.) I'm mostly interested in the WIDTH element (the 5th element) of the result, but maybe others will also show something important. It would be also interesting to compare this with a font that is displayed "normally". Thanks.