From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39799: 28.0.50; Most emoji sequences =?UTF-8?Q?don=E2=80=99t?= render correctly Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:19:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83a751e2fp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835zfrglu5.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo86g8pg.fsf@gnu.org> <83k146g46x.fsf@gnu.org> <83imjqg1iv.fsf@gnu.org> <83a752fp2d.fsf@gnu.org> <8336aufn4h.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9nqe5x2.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfolena2.fsf@gnu.org> <83imjpej3o.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftetehbg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="121974"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 39799@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mike FABIAN Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 29 18:20:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mc-000VcI-Nr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:20:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34368 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mb-0002Af-P8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mU-0002AR-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mT-0004yG-SU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mT-0004yB-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:20:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mT-00021W-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:20:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39799 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39799.15829967987765 (code B ref 39799); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2020 17:19:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35317 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mQ-00021B-67 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:19:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mN-00020v-GZ for 39799@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:19:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mI-0004wR-BK; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:19:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1714 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j85mH-0002np-JB; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:19:50 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Mike FABIAN on Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:03:01 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176681 Archived-At: > From: Mike FABIAN > Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 39799@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:03:01 +0100 > > >> I think I don’t understand that completely. But you seem to say that it > >> is possible to make Emacs use different fonts for U+24C2 and the > >> sequence U+24C2 U+FE0F ? > > > > It should be possible, yes. Define a new face, and make that face use > > a font that can display sequences like U+24C2 U+FE0E. Then put a > > 'face' text property whose value is that face you defined, on the text > > containing such a sequence. This should force Emacs to use the font > > you specified for that stretch of text, regardless of the fontset and > > the default font. > > But that would be a manual process? Or would it be displayed like that > by default? We could do something automatically using JIT font-lock mechanism, perhaps. > > Given that we don't really see why sequences with U+FE0E are needed, > > perhaps requiring Lisp programs which do want to display such > > sequences to use a special face is not such a big deal? > > Ah, I see, something like > > (require 'improve-emoji-display) > > which does this magic defining such a face. Yes.