From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43389: 28.0.50; Emacs memory leaks using hard disk all time Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:16:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83a6v7vnfg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y2j0qb2v.fsf@gnu.org> <831rgppg3w.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh3czbvz.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0udw3jb.fsf@gnu.org> <5c8da650-6f3d-8a36-6c09-4690b6c59fbe@redhat.com> <83im9vvpdi.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17025"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, 43389@debbugs.gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support, dj@redhat.com, michael_heerdegen@web.de, trevor@trevorbentley.com To: Carlos O'Donell Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:41:51 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khIek-0004Io-1L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 21:41:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51548 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khIei-0005JS-QX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:41:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khIGk-0007iL-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khIGk-0000Ed-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khIGk-00056x-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43389 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43389-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43389.160616260619603 (code B ref 43389); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2020 20:16:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khIGU-000567-D6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:16:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khIGT-00055w-3X for 43389@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:16:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khIGN-00007w-TT; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:16:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3995 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1khIGN-0007Ez-8G; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:16:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Carlos O'Donell on Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:04:33 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193975 Archived-At: > Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, 43389@debbugs.gnu.org, dj@redhat.com, > michael_heerdegen@web.de, trevor@trevorbentley.com > From: Carlos O'Donell > Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:04:33 -0500 > > > Any reason you redirect stderr to stdout? I'm not saying that is the > > reason for the EWW problems, but just to be sure, can you try without > > that? The trace goes to stderr, right? So just "2> file" should be > > sufficient to collect the trace. Carlos, am I right? > > No, the trace goes to the trace file specified by MTRACT_CTL_FILE. Thanks, that's even easier: it means no standard stream needs to be redirected.