From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31796: 27.1; dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace fails to find multiline regexps Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 22:16:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83a6v6tss9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <10120030-8b8d-b702-add4-8f099f934ed5@chalmers.se> <831rgivl7l.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfequ30g.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24639"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: abela@chalmers.se, 31796@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:18:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khelQ-0006F9-UQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:18:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48076 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khelQ-0006g8-08 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:18:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khekI-0005j3-0s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khekH-00031v-P2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:17:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khekH-0001kN-Jl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31796 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 31796-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31796.16062489776657 (code B ref 31796); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31796) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2020 20:16:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33126 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khejZ-0001jJ-2Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36412) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khejW-0001iz-5e for 31796@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:16:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khejQ-0002r6-Jn; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:16:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4472 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1khejQ-00055i-2N; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:16:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:43:22 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194114 Archived-At: > Cc: abela@chalmers.se, 31796@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:43:22 +0200 > > How about https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31796#23 ? The idea sounds fine to me. > Someone more familiar with existing ports of Grep on different systems > should weigh in on it. I don't think it's necessary. We just need to probe Grep for support of these switches, and then use it. The result cannot be worse than it is now. > >> If you're saying we can't afford to break even a minor feature like > >> this, I don't think there are a lot of options. > > > > We should try not to break any features, yes. > > That's just common sense. Of course.