From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:29:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83a6s49gki.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfbqbq3g.fsf@gnu.org> <868s7pwvq8.fsf@gmail.com> <28FB9567-61E6-4083-8711-6CF6C8A493F4@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36913"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 16:30:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Ij-0009UH-VE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:30:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48830 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Ij-0002IG-15 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Ic-0002Hr-En for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Ic-0000tI-67 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2Ic-0008Ru-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161348937632419 (code B ref 46495); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:30:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2021 15:29:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2IB-0008Qp-Sc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2IA-0008Qc-8x for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:29:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53166) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2I4-0000hz-Kz; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2100 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lC2I3-0005Qr-7M; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:29:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:34:49 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200125 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, > 46495@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:34:49 +0000 > > Andy could you point out the two libgccjit versions you used specifying > wich one was used in the successfull / failed experiment? Right, this is another potential reason for the difference. AFAIK, MinGW64 uses GCC 10.x, whereas mingw.org uses 9.2.