From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47074: Replace XPM icons with Unicode codepoints in customize/widgets Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:02:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83a6r7htrh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a6r9mwgk.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x1mpdk.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7lfjyv7.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmbjvpe.fsf@gnu.org> <83v99vias1.fsf@gnu.org> <83im5vhvde.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17049"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, 47074@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 18:26:50 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lL82L-0004M1-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:26:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58150 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL82J-0001Ea-Ka for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:26:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7fN-0004UU-42 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7fK-0005Jv-5M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7fK-0002Tm-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47074 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47074-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47074.16156549479489 (code B ref 47074); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47074) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2021 17:02:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60586 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7ek-0002Ss-N2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:02:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60354) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7eh-0002Sb-LL for 47074@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:02:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7eU-0004z8-S2; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1347 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7eN-0006zJ-Va; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:02:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:44:46 -0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202282 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:44:46 -0600 > Cc: alan@idiocy.org, 47074@debbugs.gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I don't think names matter in this case, as no one sees them except > > the source code. > > If we only consider custom.el I agree completely. But I was personally > hoping that these "improved" icons will see some use also outside of > custom, including perhaps in third-party packages. It would be nice to > have these better names for such use. Are they really significantly better? I fail to see that. > Would it be okay to just have two names/locations for these XPM files? Do we have to? > (I seem to remember that we can't use symlinks due to our support for > Windows or something? Symlinks in tarballs are trouble, not only on Windows. I feel we are again bikeshedding here, sorry. It's an insignificant issue from where I stand.