From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49278: 28.0.50; Lisp Mode is for Common Lisp Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:52:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6n7mjto.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y2asa6lg.fsf@gmail.com> <835yxwo7td.fsf@gnu.org> <83tulfmsu4.fsf@gnu.org> <83im1vmqff.fsf@gnu.org> <83eecjmpeg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, 49278@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 30 17:53:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lycWd-0003Jz-CM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:53:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46448 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lycWc-0005uI-BV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:53:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lycWM-0005qq-VP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lycWM-0000l6-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lycWM-00066y-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49278 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49278-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49278.162506832923424 (code B ref 49278); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2021 15:52:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lycVV-00065k-9U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lycVT-00065X-O9 for 49278@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lycVL-00009E-G3; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:51:59 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4417 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lycVL-0007Bb-3k; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:51:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:32:51 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209210 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: João Távora , > 49278@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:32:51 -0400 > > > Your changes were not only for the doc string. But if you want to > > focus on the doc string, would the following be okay? > > > > Major mode for editing programs in Common Lisp and other similar Lisps. > > It'd be a big improvement, yes, thanks. Thanks. > PS: I would still find it to be a lie because I can't see any place in > the code that aims to support "other similar Lisps". If they are similar enough, there's no need for such special places in the code.