From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13641: 24.3.50; `minibuffer-inactive-mode' - hook seems wrong Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:21:41 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6mo6nzu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1FC09B5AA7D44DCDA241D3947B30BFA1@us.oracle.com> <87v95cm5q5.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3087"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 13641@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 15 09:23:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3viF-0000h0-HH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:23:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53256 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3viE-0002wI-CX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3vi2-0002sa-PS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3vi2-0008Sc-G9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3vi2-0006d7-DT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13641 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 13641-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13641.162633372525394 (code B ref 13641); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13641) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2021 07:22:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3vh7-0006bU-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3vh5-0006au-I0 for 13641@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3vh0-0007ed-7e; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:21:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2565 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3vgz-0001mn-Pd; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:21:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v95cm5q5.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:49:38 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210005 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:49:38 +0200 > Cc: 13641@debbugs.gnu.org > > The mode is called both on entering and exiting the minibuffer, which > sounds slightly surprising Isn't it generally true that a mode function is called both when turning a mode on and when turning it off? Then why is the above surprising?