From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59347: 29.0.50; `:family` face setting ignored Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:53:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83a64j11mi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83cz9j9zyu.fsf@gnu.org> <838rk77yfo.fsf@gnu.org> <834juu9aya.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786024fc72f3b@heytings.org> <83a64l65ai.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e0378678a092e6ee@heytings.org> <835yf962q4.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786754c9e0aaf@heytings.org> <83zgcl4jra.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786c281cffdd4@heytings.org> <83tu2t4ie9.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786e324ff82ef@heytings.org> <83bkp04gjl.fsf@gnu.org> <83leo42vm9.fsf@gnu.org> <0d1ea3007fd94b7ae0b1@heytings.org> <83r0xv1649.fsf@gnu.org> <0d1ea3007f532a493429@heytings.org> <83cz9f12bh.fsf@gnu.org> <0d1ea3007f6995e84576@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13184"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 59347@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 15:54:34 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUfR-0003CC-PN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:54:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUey-0005bH-1S; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:54:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUew-0005ay-HP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUew-0007tc-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUew-0002r5-2c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59347 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59347-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59347.166912883010958 (code B ref 59347); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59347) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2022 14:53:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50350 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUek-0002qg-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:53:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57526) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUei-0002qS-RS for 59347@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:53:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUed-0007rb-BL; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:53:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=4YtRdKOvDOPjCKNVkkmHxWo9DyaHydbANOPjF0dLSxQ=; b=jTAfpovS7cmQ co/f5pZvrx9n8V/4r+irFTJO1WwFq85zbGTMntHfeQL+PQqlfXuEc7oSw8ds1I4f47r+b2ciMOmJs Ll/oXRQPhFpPS5qNDQJ+uiF1nXgrvz5g8Q4pmwtZh4A8h2VMCYnjuPdvGfc2ePwUf2le++Pja1ZpO kch7odh2MuFwZKYb69+Vpd5xJxHByQQAftnt01kB0q9n4oytFVvM3xF9CKMAPs5RcUYWjFlaCvEug SjMZEFgeLDl1TTD6X3ZXpIr+WViV0sdgHomHlp/HjUWgmi4l9KbLMROq/pSHVBSHcb+O5JpuVxm4T Eh7V0kLcar2coMJ1jkyIvQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxUec-0000k4-Hw; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:53:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0d1ea3007f6995e84576@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:45:20 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248648 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:45:20 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 59347@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> That's the purpose of the loop at the end of font_find_for_lface. It > >> starts with a specific spec and gradually makes it less specific if > >> necessary (that is, if no suitable font has been found with a more > >> specific spec). > > > > So we will be back to the same problem with those. > > > > Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. I mean that the basic algorithm that gradually makes the spec less specific is used for non-numerical attributes, and so can potentially reject valid fonts, just like it happens with these 3 numerical attributes.