From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:24:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83a5z014wl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <83pm7z7nkc.fsf@gnu.org> <4b63ef62-5e1c-3dcf-ec7b-06b69e79133b@gutov.dev> <83o7nj7mfn.fsf@gnu.org> <556e0fbb-215e-c11d-0e8b-73e97441abbb@gutov.dev> <83pm7y6fdo.fsf@gnu.org> <47140c27-ba63-ca7b-8b9e-cc38a6f9a866@gutov.dev> <838rem636a.fsf@gnu.org> <83leil4u63.fsf@gnu.org> <8a9d0e2b-6ae2-bcdc-efd0-52a44ac862bb@gutov.dev> <83h6t94hru.fsf@gnu.org> <7676c8d2-1324-31e7-38b3-de167ecf683a@gutov.dev> <8e9bd99a-3093-3b69-8429-aa1ae6b7240d@gutov.dev> <834jp82u5c.fsf@gnu.org> <83ildo189j.fsf@gnu.org> <6e91a10e-e8bb-c7db-f6ce-917790e7e391@gutov.dev> <83edoc1602.fsf@gnu.org> <79b17d02-5f95-43cc-ed5b-dfa7618b6f21@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25598"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 14:25:23 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCIs-0006T1-DF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 14:25:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCIb-0004ih-2A; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCIZ-0004iT-FO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCIZ-0004vc-4N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCIY-0000kj-Gu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 12:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16821662432808 (code B ref 62720); Sat, 22 Apr 2023 12:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2023 12:24:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCHa-0000jE-Un for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCHX-0000ih-TP for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCHQ-0004pW-PQ; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:23:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=kMPxDQxf2+W1paVKy9D9SGWdxS4OY7fg9SlbbmTttPk=; b=Z6Z7AE5LWIjP wDSqhSYo/5APTlH+oTRHyTLXP0Zy9xjtec/Q2cTYXV+3Yh2k54UZHXiQhcTnlzejAwjWnEqTIQHpP 0W8pz2Kr6KoAGM9xAkmjCDfM+CtKnkmd8g1d90pH0NLimysXJQCweGHmCu9eKu/8NsjGnPBN/Ia3C asWAsqcZanP7DA2Qsuj8ABfkOy1hMQRwSQzxHQ4iyD/5y8ffgKkcWCGlOnY62TDTSRK9uMficuima MUcyJcXiUaWLDrjcshfzN1cQ7dKFt9pPw3mqCBTvKQcfVNuibCH6qChp44X9miC4jvwLiWV25sIc5 PnMRfPiqZzOyXYbVqLOiiA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pqCHP-000598-Uf; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 08:23:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <79b17d02-5f95-43cc-ed5b-dfa7618b6f21@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:14:01 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260468 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:14:01 +0300 > Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, > joaotavora@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 22/04/2023 15:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Also think forward to Emacs 30: I think the most reasonable choice would > >> be to have package-update upgrade builtins by default, whereas > >> package-update-all and package-menu-mark-for-upgrades probably still > >> need to be preffed off (not sure, but we won't be able to make the > >> choice until later, I think). > > I don't see why package-update and package-update-all should behave > > differently wrt core packages. If the user expresses his/her will to > > update core packages, then package-update-all should do this for all > > of them. > > The idea is that if the user invokes 'M-x package-update' interactively > and inputs the name of the package, they express their intention to > update said package this way. Whether it's core or not. > > With package-update-all or package-menu-mark-for-update, the user does > not have a chance to specify which of the core packages they want to > upgrade, if any. That's why we should have both the prefix-arg and the user option: one is for one-off update of a single package, the other for updating many of them. It's the same logic as for package-install in those cases.